On January 29, 2024, the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN) published press release 023/2024, by means of which it communicated the resolution of the Plenary regarding the controversy on the constitutionality of section I, last paragraph, of article 151 of the Industrial Property Law (now repealed).
This section established that the nullity action against a trademark registration granted in violation of the law could be brought at any time. In this regard, a company filed an injunction alleging the unconstitutionality of this provision under the argument that it would contravene the principles of legal certainty of the holder, since a trademark could face a nullity without a defined term.
After three years of uncertainty, the Court determined that the imprescriptibility of exercising the nullity action is legally valid, considering that an illegal trademark registration may be challenged at any time, since " the mere passage of time cannot cure the illegality of its granting".
It is important to note that this determination only concerns the lack of statute of limitations in the exercise of nullity actions based on section I, last paragraph, of article 151 of the Industrial Property Law, which is correlative to section I of article 258 of the Federal Law for the Protection of Industrial Property, in force.