Implementation of a “family protocol” for the management of the participation of a family group in a stock corporation

By: Antoine Del Sordo Véliz

In general terms, the family protocol is an agreement among various members of the same family that seeks to regulate family relationships and the management of a company or companies of which they are common shareholders, protecting thereby the right development and subsistence of both family relationships and family business(es).

In the context of a stock corporation in which family members partially own the capital stock of a corporation, the family protocol has two key objectives. First, it seeks to form a cohesive voting block among the family members, and second, to establish rules and dispute resolution mechanisms within the family that are respected by all its members. This aims that purely family or personal matters do not affect business decisions related to the management of the company, and at the time, maintain at all times a unified vote in the Shareholders' Meetings.

In terms of the above, as part of this protocol, in cases in which family members are partial owners of the capital stock of a corporation, granting preemptive rights among the family members, non-sale agreements and regulation to determine the direction of voting at Shareholders' Meetings are usually agreements that are included, which are explained with more detail below:

1. Preemptive rights:

It is a right granted to family members to acquire shares offered for sale by another family member. In this case it will be important to establish: (i) a prior written notice by which the family member who wishes to sell shares informs the price at which plans to sell them together with the supporting calculation, as well as other essential terms of the sale so that the other family members can exercise, where appropriate, their preemptive right; and (ii) establish regulations to solve any controversy in the event that several family members want to exercise their right.

Likewise, within the regulation of the preemptive right and taking into account the characteristics of the relevant company, it can be regulated that the selling shareholder be bound to: (i) submit to the non-selling shareholders who signed the family protocol information that allows to determine that third party offer to buy is in good faith, (ii) providing the identity of the controlling beneficiary of the potential acquirer non family member, (iii) make the potential third party buyer being bound to acquire at the agreed upon price in case the shareholders who subscribed the family protocol do not exercise their preemptive right, foreseeing on the contrary for a liquidated damages clause payable by the seller (is common that the penalty amounts at least a 50% of the purchase price), and/or (iv) a preferential price in percentage below the third party’s offer, at all times within the market value of the shares, to favor the acquisition by the shareholders who signed the protocol and discourage third parties from acquiring shares of the company.

2. Non-sale agreements::

By these non-sale agreements, it is undertaken that none of the family members may sell their shares to any shareholder or to any third party directly or indirectly related to a current shareholder who has not signed the family protocol, seeking that shareholders who are not members of the family increase their shareholding to obtain control of the company. It is important that in order for the non-sale agreement not to be void, it is thoroughly determined which person or group of persons cannot acquire the shares since, if it is stipulated that the shares cannot be sold except to members of the family, said obligation could be null, particularly in the case in which the family members do not want or are able to acquire the shares that are sought to be sold.

Moreover, it is important to mention that considering the family ties between the protocol's signatory members, it may be convenient to regulate issues that, although they could be null/non-enforceable from a legal perspective, may have an important ethical and moral weight within the family, thus inducing the behavior sought as a moral obligation.

3. Agreements on voting at Shareholders' Meetings:

A fundamental part of family protocols that include regulations on stock corporations involve determining in advance the direction of the vote at Shareholders' Meetings so that all family members vote in the direction previously determined by the majority of its members. Depending on the degree of control aimed to achieve, there are various mechanisms that can be implemented.

One mechanism would be to establish holding meetings among the signatory members of the family protocol to determine in advance the direction of the vote in the Shareholders' Meeting, same determination that should be binding even for family members who may have not been able to attend the family meeting prior to the Shareholders' Meeting, providing for a liquidated damages clause in the case in which a family member votes against to what was agreed upon. The effectiveness of this mechanism will depend mainly on the penalty amount since, in the end, each family member would individually and personally exercise their vote in the Shareholders' Meeting.

Another alternative would be to establish a syndication of shares appointing a director of the syndicate, who is granted with irrevocable powers of attorney to vote the shares in the direction determined by the majority of the family members in their capacity as syndicated shareholders, prior to the holding the relevant Shareholders' Meeting. The advantage of this mechanism which implies a broad degree of control is that it shields the company from potential takeovers by another group of shareholders who are not part of the family protocol, ensures power over other shareholders who may be in a feud, and helps to maintain control of the company, since through the exercise of the irrevocable power it is ensured that the voting of family members is casted in the same direction.

Although in Mexico, unlike other countries such as Spain, the family protocol is not yet explicitly regulated, it can legally operate as an atypical contract or a shareholder’s agreement with respect to a stock company. Furthermore, it should be noted that although the regulation regarding a corporation is an essential element of the family protocol, its objectives and regulation are much broader than a mere agreement among shareholders, since it also may comprise clear and precise rules regarding intimate aspects of the family independent from the company, such as methods to solve family conflicts, orders of incapacity of its members, forms and methods to obtain resources, philanthropic aspects, public image of the family and its members, etc.

Hence, depending on the extent of the assets and regulations outlined in the family protocol, various family governance bodies may be established, such as (a) family council, serving as the executive and governing body of the family, and although it does not have decision-making authority, it usually executes the decisions adopted by the family assembly and acts as a bridge between the family assembly and the family businesses, (b) family assembly, which comprises all family members and makes the decisions; the main objective of this body is to achieve family cohesion and maintain a unified front, and (c) external advisors, who must be impartial experts advising on decision-making and helping resolve conflicts that may arise among family members.

In conclusion, a family protocol can result an appealing tool for families seeking to maintain control of a family business. This is particularly relevant in the case of a stock corporation partially controlled by a family since; by establishing clear rules for decision-making within the company, the protocol can prevent the gradual dilution of control over the family business due to conflicts or divergent interests over time. Simultaneously, it enables the regulation of intimate family matters, potentially avoiding protracted and costly legal disputes (which generally end up permeating the family company). For instance, the protocol may provide guidance in situations such as a member’s incapacity or significant conflicts between siblings or parents and children. The above, through the establishment of action and dispute resolution mechanisms that help strengthen family values and, at the same time, the subsistence of the family and family businesses.

In case you are interested in implementing a family protocol tailored to your family’s needs, do not hesitate to contact our Firm.

Pablo Gómez Sainz

[email protected]

Antoine Del Sordo Véliz

[email protected]


 


 

Restructuring

Müggenburg, Gorches and Peñalosa's restructuring practice includes representation of corporate debtors, hedge funds, in various industries, etc., in restructuring proceedings and bankruptcy equivalents (insolvency proceedings).

Mergers & Acquisitions

We provide services in acquisitions, sales, mergers, spin-offs, reorganizations and co-investments, representing national and foreign clients operating in various industrial and commercial sectors.

Corporate /Transactional

At Müggenburg, Gorches y Peñalosa we provide legal services in all aspects of corporate law practice. Our group of professionals in this area has years of experience providing services to both national and international clients, with the most diverse needs and the highest standards of demand and sophistication in the service. Among our clientele are leading companies in their sectors worldwide, such as automotive, cosmetics, hotels and tourism, food industry, aeronautical industry, computer programs and systems, suppliers of the oil industry, technology, among others.

We advise our clients on the constitution of Mexican companies (commercial and civil) and associations, attending to the needs derived from the industry and/or commerce segment in which they focus their activities and their medium and long-term plans, also providing services for compliance with the regulatory requirements that may apply, including those derived from direct foreign investment, economic competition and obtaining the necessary licenses and permits for its operation. Our services also extend to the provision of corporate services within the ordinary course of business of our clients, including advice on the preparation, review and negotiation of all types of civil and commercial contracts, and the custody, updating and maintenance of corporate books. . We also provide services related to the opening and management of branches in Mexico of foreign companies.

We represent national and foreign corporate and/or investment groups in the acquisition of, and/or merger with, Mexican business entities, and on other occasions we also represent acquired Mexican entities. In both cases, we provide legal audit services to foresee possible contingencies of the operation, locate areas of opportunity and help determine the value of the company to be acquired. Likewise, in representing the acquirer, we prepare the legal documentation of the operation (specifically contracts for the sale of shares and/or association, with all its annexes and accessory contracts), and we carry out their negotiation with the counterparty. Likewise, in these cases we participate directly in the processing and obtaining of any authorizations, permits, licenses and concession titles required for the operation of our clients, and we advise on notices and notifications to government entities, including notifications of resolutions and opinions of the Federal Economic Competition Commission.

We provide advisory services for corporate restructuring and reorganization, also including international corporate groups with a presence in Mexico. In these cases we have worked in coordination with groups of financial and accounting advisors both from Mexico and abroad, and we have coordinated legal audits of subsidiaries of entities acquired in several Latin American countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Peru, among others, with local legal advisers in each case).

We advise on operations of association in participation, "joint-ventures", preparation and negotiation of agreements between shareholders, merger and spin-off of legal entities, establishment of trusts of any type, constitution of guarantees on any type of property, repurchase of shares by of companies listed on the Mexican Stock Exchange, as well as in the structure of purchase option plans and other types of specialized corporate operations.

We also provide services for the development of mechanisms that allow the efficient and effective anticipation and management of potential conflicts between shareholders; in this regard, we have represented groups of shareholders of Mexican companies in the implementation of corporate actions to defend their interests against the rest of the shareholders and the Company itself on internal corporate control issues, generally in coordination with litigation areas in matters commercial and civil.

Depending on each particular project or operation, we rely on other specialty areas of the Firm, in order to provide comprehensive services, under the highest standards of quality and efficiency.

Mergers & Acquisitions

We provide services in acquisitions, sales, mergers, spin-offs, reorganizations and co-investments, representing national and foreign clients operating in various industrial and commercial sectors.

Restructuring (Corporate and Financial)

Müggenburg, Gorches and Peñalosa's restructuring practice includes representation of corporate debtors, hedge funds, in various industries, etc., in restructuring proceedings and bankruptcy equivalents (insolvency proceedings).